Talk:Agenda 21
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agenda 21 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Agenda 21. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Agenda 21 at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
conspiracy theories
[edit]I feel like this should be separate section rather than a subsection of subsection of a subsection, etc. Seananony (talk) 00:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class Environment articles
- High-importance Environment articles
- C-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- C-Class United Nations articles
- WikiProject United Nations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles